SOP for the evaluator
Endorsed by
Motivation
- SOPs for defining methodology and proces of the based on its type
- defining the methodology (literature review, interview, , etc.)
- should cover all phases of planning/execution
- model for a final report
Potential Solutions
Following solutions could be addressing this gap.
- checklist for AAR and HotWash
- checklist for the different roles/tasks of individual evaluators
- checklists for interviewing, review, observations, etc.
- behaviour during observation (code of conduct)
Rationale & related CM function(s)
Rationale
- Defined Roles and Functions within the exercise organisation and evaluation efforts
- Pre-defined checklists or forms to log observations throughout an exercise
- Possible options of documenting perceptions (e.g. text, photos, videos, audio recordings, drawings, map annotations, etc.), which can be utilized for evaluation
- Tools and methods to process perceptions in order to generate evaluation insights (e.g. through efficient compilation, analysis, data visualization, etc.)
- Events (e.g. Workshops) to discuss and analyse findings
 |
Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects. |