SOP for the evaluator
Endorsed by
Motivation
- SOPs for defining methodology and proces of the evaluation based on its type
- defining the methodology (literature review, interview, observation, etc.)
- should cover all phases of exercise planning/execution
- model for a final report
Potential Solutions
Following solutions could be addressing this gap.
- checklist for AAR and HotWash
- checklist for the different roles/tasks of individual evaluators
- checklists for interviewing, review, observations, etc.
- behaviour during observation (code of conduct)
Rationale & related CM function(s)
Rationale
- Defined Roles and Functions within the exercise organisation and evaluation efforts
- Pre-defined checklists or forms to log observations throughout an exercise
- Possible options of documenting perceptions (e.g. text, photos, videos, audio recordings, drawings, map annotations, etc.), which can be utilized for evaluation
- Tools and methods to process perceptions in order to generate evaluation insights (e.g. through efficient compilation, analysis, data visualization, etc.)
- Events (e.g. Workshops) to discuss and analyse findings
 |
El sitio web Portfolio of Solutions se desarrolló inicialmente en el marco del proyecto DRIVER+. En la actualidad, el servicio está gestionado por el AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, en beneficio de la gestión europea de . El PoS está avalado y apoyado por la Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA), así como por los proyectos STAMINA y TeamAware H2020. |