SOP for the evaluator
Endorsed by
Motivation
- SOPs for defining methodology and proces of the evaluation based on its type
- defining the methodology (literature review, interview, , etc.)
- should cover all phases of exercise planning/execution
- model for a final report
Potential Solutions
Following solutions could be addressing this gap.
- checklist for AAR and HotWash
- checklist for the different roles/tasks of individual evaluators
- checklists for interviewing, review, observations, etc.
- behaviour during observation (code of conduct)
Rationale & related CM function(s)
Rationale
- Defined Roles and Functions within the exercise organisation and evaluation efforts
- Pre-defined checklists or forms to log observations throughout an exercise
- Possible options of documenting perceptions (e.g. text, photos, videos, audio recordings, drawings, map annotations, etc.), which can be utilized for evaluation
- Tools and methods to process perceptions in order to generate evaluation insights (e.g. through efficient compilation, analysis, data visualization, etc.)
- Events (e.g. Workshops) to discuss and analyse findings
 |
Le site web Portfolio of Solutions a été initialement développé dans le cadre du projet DRIVER+. Aujourd'hui, le service est géré par AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, au profit de l'European Crisis Management. Le PoS est approuvé et soutenu par le Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) ainsi que par les projets STAMINA et TeamAware H2020. |