Knowledge, Experiences and Training Needs of Health Professionals about Disaster Preparedness and Response in Southwest Ethiopia: a cross sectional study.
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, the magnitude and intensity of disasters have been vividly rising globally due to the forces of nature or man. This study aimed at assessing the perceived knowledge, experiences and needs of health professionals regarding disasters, their and management in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia. METHODS: An institution based cross-sectional survey was conducted on 377 health professionals taken from 9 randomly selected districts out of 18. All health professionals working at health offices, hospitals and health centers were included. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire which was developed by the investigators after reviewing the relevant literature in the field. Data were coded and entered into SPSS 20 software for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were done. RESULTS: The majority (85.1%) of the participants were able to define the concept of from various perspectives; 9.7% did not know about it at all and 5.2% could describe the concept partially or misconceived it. The majority (84.3%) agreed that has direct public health consequences on humans. The main public health consequence of disaster the participants mentioned was environmental pollution (65.8%). Malaria, measles and diarrhoeal diseases accounted for 35.5%, 33.1% and 10.5% of the epidemics, respectively. Only 20.6% of the respondents were trained on disaster related topics in the last two years. The majority felt that they had poor knowledge on early warning indicators of drought (48.0%) and flood (48.0%). Simialry, 50.8%, 47.7%, 51.1% and 42.6% of the participants had poor knowledge on to drought, preparedness to flood, to drought, to flood. On composite scale, they generally perceived to have adequate (29.4%), moderate (32.4%) and poor (38.2%) knowledge about early warning information bout, preparedness for and response to common disasters. A vast majority (92.8%) reported that they on disaster preparedness, management and response. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of professionals had limited understanding about the concept of disaster and response to certain specific disasters. They also had limited opportunities for training,despite their felt needs. Therefore, training should be provided focusing on the specific gaps identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]/nCopyright of Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences is the property of Jimma University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Data were coded and entered into SPSS 20 software for cleaning and analysis. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were done.
Cross-sectional survey
preparednessTraining NeedPossible public health consequences of
The designed questionnaire was pretested by involving the data collectors as part of their practical
Data were collected using a structured questionnaire which was developed by the investigators after reviewing the relevant literature in the field An institution based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 9 randomly selected districts out of the total of 18.
This study aimed at assessing the perceived knowledge, experiences and needs of health professionals regarding disasters, their and management in Jimma Zone, Southwest Ethiopia.
Recall bias might have been introduced as the respondents were asked about events that occurred in the past.although private practitioners are important stakeholders during major situations, they were excluded from the study
A considerable number of health professionals had limited knowledge about the concept of and to certain specific disasters. About a quarter could not be able to describe the acronym “ABC” in first aid management of trauma. About a third had inadequate knowledge about early warning information, and regarding common disasters. In addition, they had limited opportunities for on topics related to , despite their felt needs.
The proposal was ethically approved by Jimma University Ethical Review Board. Participation was voluntary and respondents were given a chance to refuse or discontinue the interview at any time.
The questionnaire included socio-economic and demographic characteristics of respondents, their knowledge, experiences and needs about early warning, and . The questions particularly focused on common disasters including drought, flood, epidemic diseases and fire and traffic accidents.
 |
Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects. |