Publication | Findings |
---|---|
Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool. | The reliability of the Johns Hopkins/AHRQ drill performance was evaluated by applying it to multiple hospitals in Los Angeles County, CA, participating in the November 2005 California statewide drill. |
Atmospheric dispersion and impact modeling systems: How are they perceived as support tools for nuclear crises management? | The main pillars the interview revolved around were: (i) communication and information: understanding the main flow of communication between the different actors and the information they to fulfill their missions and wherethey look for them; (ii) understanding interviewees’ experience about the use of ADIAM systems and expertise. |
Barriers to implementing infection prevention and control guidelines during crises: Experiences of health care professionals. | cross-sectional study used questionnaires tailoredto 4 groups: consultant microbiologists (M), infectionpreventionists (IP), public health physicians (PHP),and public health nurses (PHN).Each group’s questionnaire was designed based on in-depth interviews with professionals in that groupAll interviewees had been actively involved in one or more of 4 recent situations due to infectious outbreaks in The Netherlands: severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) |
Building Capacity for Community Disaster Preparedness: A Call for Collaboration Between Public Environmental Health and Emergency Preparedness and Response Programs. (Cover story) | The interviews explored six main topics: existing community EHEP outreach and activitiesreadiness to engage communities in EHEP outreachbenefits, barriers, and risks to engaging communities in EHEP outreachperceived community and resiliencethe role of social capital and social cohesion in and personal preparedness |
Building health care system capacity to respond to disasters: successes and challenges of disaster preparedness health care coalitions. | Major topical areas covered in the interview guide included:the establishment and history of the coalitionstrengths and weaknesses of the HCC structurespecific challenges encountered in improving health care systems capabilities‘‘promising practices’’ to be shared with other coalition leaders. Questions |
Burn Disaster Response Planning in New York City: Updated Recommendations for Best Practices. | The overarching goal of the guidelines was to outline a that allows for large numbers of burn injured victims to be cared for 3 to 5 days afteran event until such time that tertiary burn care can be secured or the patient is safe for discharge with appropriate follow-up outpatient care. |
Challenges in coordination: differences in perception of civil and military organizations by comparing international scientific literature and field experiences. | The aim of this study was to identify the perception-related challenges in civil–military coordination, and how they are perceived in the field by civil and military teams, and to investigate whether perception-related challenges and their implications have been reported in the international literature. |
Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER): An Innovative Emergency Management Tool in the United States. | To demonstrate how inclusion of the Centers for Disease Control and ´s Community for Public Health (CASPER) as a in Public Health Capabilities: National Standards for State and Local Planning can increase public health capacity for |
Comparing four operational SAR-based water and flood detection approaches. | In this study, the design of the four approaches and their methodological backgrounds are explained in detail, while simultaneously elaborating on the preferred application domains for the different algorithms. The advantages and disadvantages of the four approaches are identified by qualitatively as well as quantitatively evaluating the water masks derived from data of the TanDEM-X mission for five test sites located in Vietnam, China, Germany, Mali, and the Netherlands. |
Computer-based collaborative training for transportation security and emergency response | e implementation of a computer-based, collaborative prototype foremergency in a Department of Transportation and its ability to improve organizational communication, resources and methods utilization, and best actions to follow in order to mitigate emergencies |
Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects. |