Atmospheric dispersion and impact modeling systems: How are they perceived as support tools for nuclear crises management?

Interviewer notes were transcribed and sent back to interviewees for validation.

Literature survey Interviews

cooperation between scientific advisors and decision makers

Semistructured approach was selected to address two main topicsdeclined in the form of guiding questions.

Semi-structured interviews have been conducted in 2012–2013 with representatives of the French civilian protection community taking part in the emergency response (total of 8)

This paper focuses on the use of Atmospheric Dispersion and Impact Assessment Modeling (ADIAM) in nuclear emergency management. This paper aims to study how this expertise is used during

Condición inestable que implica un cambio inminente, brusco o notable que requiere atención y medidas urgentes para proteger la vida, los recursos, la propiedad o el medioambiente.
 

read more

situation and question the notion of ‘‘decision support’’.Analysis is based on a conceptual framework that assesses how individuals and group of individuals make sense and react to a situation in difficult conditions.

ADIAM cartographic results have the potential to reinforce the construction of a share understanding between experts and decision makers of the radiological situation leading to a more efficient management of emergency and

Condición inestable que implica un cambio inminente, brusco o notable que requiere atención y medidas urgentes para proteger la vida, los recursos, la propiedad o el medioambiente.
 

read more

situations.

The main pillars the interview revolved around were: (i) communication and information: understanding the main flow of communication between the different actors and the information they need to fulfill their missions and wherethey look for them; (ii) understanding interviewees’ experience about the use of ADIAM systems and expertise.