| Publication | Findings |
|---|---|
| Assessing the reliability and the expected performance of a network under disaster risk. | Evaluate several probabilistic measures of connectivity and expected travel time/distance between critical origin–destination pairs to assess the functionality of a given transportation network in case of a disasasterDependency model |
| Assessment of the reliability of the Johns Hopkins/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality hospital disaster drill evaluation tool. | All data were entered into a Microsoft Access database. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 8.1 and Stata SE 8. |
| Atmospheric dispersion and impact modeling systems: How are they perceived as support tools for nuclear crises management? | Interviewer notes were transcribed and sent back to interviewees for validation. |
| Barriers to implementing infection prevention and control guidelines during crises: Experiences of health care professionals. | Data from questionnaires were analyzed using SPSSEach question could be answered with strongly agree/agree/rather/disagree/strongly disagree |
| Building Capacity for Community Disaster Preparedness: A Call for Collaboration Between Public Environmental Health and Emergency Preparedness and Response Programs. (Cover story) | Each interview was transcribed verbatim and analyzed with field notes using grounded theory methods of emerging line-by-line coding to first develop and apply a resulting codebook to all text using NVivo 8, a qualitative data analysis software, to categorize, query, and examine the data. The transcripts were analyzed for emergent themes and supported by critical quotes. |
| Building health care system capacity to respond to disasters: successes and challenges of disaster preparedness health care coalitions. | The audio recordings were transcribed by an online transcription service, and transcripts were analyzed qualitatively using QSR NVivo 10 qualitative analysis software |
| Burn Disaster Response Planning in New York City: Updated Recommendations for Best Practices. | Review of meeting minutes and the 11 deliverables of the draft response plan was performed |
| Challenges in coordination: differences in perception of civil and military organizations by comparing international scientific literature and field experiences. | systematic analysisThe responses obtained in the form of different views and perceptions were compared to the themes that had been identified from the literature review. |
| Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER): An Innovative Emergency Management Tool in the United States. | Statistical analysis was done in MS Excel 2010. The authors compared data on all CASPERs and trainings conducted from 2012 through 2016 with respect to differences in geographic distribution, type of activity, and results or actions taken by decision-makers. They only included in-person, domestic CASPER training sessions that were not a part of a CASPER assessment; international, Webinar, and “just-in-time” trainings were excluded. |
| Computer-based collaborative training for transportation security and emergency response | Descriptive statistics |
 |
Portfolio of Solutions web site has been initially developed in the scope of DRIVER+ project. Today, the service is managed by AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH., for the benefit of the European Crisis Management. PoS is endorsed and supported by the Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA) as well as by the STAMINA and TeamAware H2020 projects. |