Publication | Findings |
---|---|
'G.A.T.E': Gap Analysis for TTX evaluation. | Main evaluation criteria:Response accuracyTime of response |
25 Years of MCDA in nuclear emergency management. | Structuring the problem in terms of alternatives and criteria |
A 3-year Health Care Coalition Experience in Advancing Hospital Evacuation Preparedness. | planning, communications, community participation, medical surge, mass care, and medical supply management |
A container multimodal transportation scheduling approach based on immune affinity model for emergency relief | 8 components and 11 affinity measures for the immune-inspired affinity model |
A continuous approximation approach for assessment routing in disaster relief | CostImplementation complexitysum of arrival times |
A decision support system for debris-flow hazard mitigation in towns based on numerical simulation: a case study at Dongchuan, Yunnan Province. | Mode /functions)l for the system:Outdoor monitoringData transmission modelData analysis modelStrategic decision model |
A dynamic decision support system based on geographical information and mobile social networks: A model for tsunami risk mitigation in Padang, Indonesia. | Risk regionFacilities locationShelter locationBarrier report |
A dynamic model for disaster response considering prioritized demand points. | - (i) accessibility of demand points, (ii) time that people at demand points have been waiting for relief items, and (iii) importance or urgency of each type of relief items. |
A general computational recognition primed decision model with multi-agent rescue simulation benchmark | Burnt Area Proportion (between 0 and 1) (?)Death toll Proportion (between 0 and 1) (?) |
A general methodology for data-based rule building and its application to natural disaster management | Predicted results about the number of casualties, number of injured, homeless, affected people and damage in US dollars by the SEDD. |
Serwis internetowy Portfolio of Solutions został początkowo opracowany w ramach projektu DRIVER+. Obecnie serwis jest zarządzany przez AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, na rzecz Europejskiego Zarządzania Kryzysowego. PoS jest popierany i wspierany przez Disaster Competence Network Austria (DCNA), jak również przez projekty STAMINA i TeamAware H2020. |