Based on a specific

Metrics Assessing Specialty-specific Team Work.Metrics Assessing Generic Team Work.LOSA, OTAS, ANTS,CATS (see p.1092 for details)

number of homeless loss of economic activitydata for obtaining reliable estimates of the disaster

“….assess and improve the existing evacuation plans.” Pp. 928

Metrics related to the Quality of Service (QoS) – with its corresponding classification rules for each:Agent’s performancePerformance of a MASRole performance

Critical informationTo classify information, an improved versions of the classifications of information for SAR operation is used (Nissinen, 2009)Pg 4Communication-who with whom -the nature of the interaction, using four types of social context (informal/formal; face-to-face/virtual)

Time-out session accuracySpeed, accuracy, and SA level of responseOffshore experience and response timeSA self-ratingLimitations of the ERFB

Selection criteria for the ontology evaluation approaches are described. (Tble 2, pg 1197)

Feasibility: ICATS-N_ should be reasonably easy to use in real ORs and also in the context of simulation-based training.a. The tool is observational, and thus non-intrusive in its useb. The tool consists of a relatively small number of itemsc. The tool consists of observable behaviours (i.e., the amount of inference involved from the part of the rater/trainer is minimised) Feasibility was evaluated qualitatively: did the trainer OR nurse of our study find the tool usable?Reliability: ICATS-N_ should capture OR nurses’ technical skills consistently.The tool consists of observable behaviours (i.e., the amount of inference involved from the part of the rater/trainer is minimised) Reliability was evaluated quantitatively in the form of internal consistency (Cronbach a coefficients)Validity: ICATS-N_ should capture what it purports to capture (i.e., OR nurses’ technical skills). Face validity was evaluated qualitatively, via expert opinion in the development of the tool. Content validity was evaluated (i) qualitatively, via expert opinion in the development of the tool and (ii) quantitatively, via correlational analyses of core skills as defined in ICATS-N.

Nurses’ Preparedness for Disastersperceived level of disaster preparednessLearning Needs for Disaster Preparedness