In another measurement campaign five years later, several UAV-videos covering building walls were recorded. A video sequence with around 200 frames was processed by a SLAM method

Kendalss’s W, Kendall’s tau, Kendall’s tau-b

Assessment Methods:There are three main categories for assessing simulation skills: psychometric tools for interpersonal/communications skills; checklists for procedural skills; and pretests and posttests for knowledge.Psychometric Tools for Interpersonal/Communications SkillsPsychometrics, instruments, or metrics used to conduct assessment are effective for simulations involving interpersonal/communications skills. Behaviorally anchored rating scale involved the assessment of four elements performed by the physician during the simulations including establishing an appropriate environment, engaging the patient, disclosure/apology, and helping the patient achieve an approach to the event. The encounter is videotaped and rated on a 7-point scale: 1 (extremely ineffective) to 7 (extremely effective). This assessment method can give structured insight to the learner on areas of strength and weakness.Another way is the 360-degree evaluation form, which includes a checklist of 10 items (pertaining to important interpersonal/communication skills), which were each rated using a Likert response format. Feedback from the attending physician and the patient was given to the resident after an observed encounter, and a personal quality improvement interview was conducted.The third way is the Kalamazoo Essential Elements Communication Checklist that consists of seven key elements of physician communications: (1) builds relationships, (2) opens the discussion, (3) gathers information, (4) understands patient’s perspective, (5) shares information, (6) reaches agreement, and (7) provides closure.Procedural SkillsChecklist assesses whether critical actions were performed for specific scenarios.Pretests and Posttests for KnowledgeThese checklists included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, amount of contrast used, and lesion coverage.Observational assessment toolProcedure-specific checklists are based on accurate performance of procedural steps and scoring based on error execution. Components of generic global rating scales that can be applied to a wide variety of simulation scenarios and specialties include items such as respect for tissue, efficiency of time and motion, instrument handling, knowledge of instruments, use of assistants, flow of operation, forward planning, and knowledge of specific procedural steps.

Thematic analysis. All audio-taped data were transcribed into word format. Three data sets had been created and they had been categorized under the titles of formal, informal, and shared leadership.open-ended questions approachlength from 30 minutes to 40 minutes

The difference in answers between the business school students and public relations students was tested using the z-test for differences in proportions in two independent samples

After scenario analyzing, based on the method presented in Section 3, the ‘‘event–task–resource” are mapped into element subspace, and the CDIRS space structure model is constructed as shown in Fig. 11analyzing the validity and the interoperability of the reasoning result of this case.

Descriptive statistics and correlations between variables analyzed in SPSSe.g. Linear regression, SPSS Harmon’s single factor method.

Multiple experts evaluate the direct relations of influential factors in emergency management respectively from positive and negative side. The evaluation results are presented as intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs). Convert the IFNs into D numbers and use the combination rule of D numbers to fuse group opinions. Based on DEMATEL, the cause-effect classification of factors can be obtained.The factors in cause category are identified as CSFs in emergency management.

Activity theory approach

First, we compare the effectiveness of F-Max-Sum in maximizing the number of tasks completed compared with a number of other strategiesIn the next, we evaluate how efficient F-Max-Sum is compared with Max- Sum in dealing with changes in the set of tasks.